Home discussions products about writing Projects

Open Source for Collaborative Knowledge Development and Learning

Note: This site's content is accessible to all versions of every browser. However, this browser may not support basic Web standards, preventing the display of our site's design details. We support the mission of the Web Standards Project in the campaign encouraging users to upgrade their browsers.


Blog Entry [details and replies]

KNotations :: Documentation and development plans from the KnowNet development team Weblog 84 entries 23-June-2006 1 authors
show or hide details for this item How-to make ecto play nicely with bbedit when using non-ecto markup Blog Entry 0 replies 27-November-2004 Mike Malloch
Kind:
Blog Entry
Created:
27-November-2004 11:54:50
Last Updated:
27-November-2004 12:33:27
Author:
Mike Malloch
Status:
visible
I was getting irritated that ecto wanted to step on my markup when I chose to edit in bbedit (reminding me of huge issues we had with kupu a while back)... but a litttle exploration of prererences sorted it all out...

It turns out that all you have to do is go to ecto preferences / editing and change the default editing mode to html, and then ecto will refrain from trying to understand your markup. Of course this means giving up wysiwyg by default, but that is fine by me - and it is easy to switch modes.

This isa constant problem for WYSIWYG editing: doing visual editing of content that has been marked up 'properly' to begin with, using for example nice semantic markup with definition lists, acronyms etc etc. We had a big problem with kupu and the NGRF site content development; we had yound Mathew slaving away bulk converting MSWord content into clean, semanticall marked-up web documents, then an editor would fix something in kupu and destroy a lot of markup. We had to fiddle with kupu to try to get it to understand the markup, but this is made hard because of the way the native browser contetEditable works :O(

anyway... below is an example of using markup ecto does not know how to edit, and editing the post aftwerwards without problem...

testing a definition list, and edited

this
def of this
that
def of that

Comments please

If you are already registered here, please click the "Login" button to send your username/password with the comment. Click the "Anonymous" button to leave a comment without logging in.

Please tell us who you are

E-Mail Address (Required)
We need a valid email address in order for you to post a comment. You will recieve an email containing a special validation link. The comment will not be published until validated
Name
Please leave your name
Title
Lead-in
Body Text ( HTML tags are allowed )
Validation
Please enter the text from the image above
Preview your comment