Exploring mentoring
15-June-2005
permalink comments (1)OK - working on a few projects at once at the moment. Will try to post stuff as I write it.
One of the things I am working on is mentoring. This is for a European project led by the Athens Chamber of Commerce. The project aims to train some sixty mentors to support participants on work experience and to help socially disadvantaged people gain employment. In the first phase of the work we are looking at different experiences and practices in mentoring to develop a firmer concept and work programme for the project and to inform the development of a training programme for the mentors. My role is to provide notes of experiences, research and practices in mentoring.
What particularly interests me in this is that - as I have written before - learning is taking place in ever wider contexts. This in turn is leading to new roles for teachers and trainers. Many of the competencies required of a workplace mentor will be - I suspect - very similar to the role of teachers and trainers in e-learning.
This first note looks at definitions of mentoring and examines how mentoring can support learning within the workplace.
Extended text for this entry:
Mentoring is typically defined as a relationship between an experienced and a less experienced person in which the mentor provides guidance, advice, support, and feedback to the protégé (Haney 1997).
Mentoring has also been seen as:
- a way to help new employees learn about organizational culture (Bierema 1996),
- a means to facilitate personal and career growth and development, and to expand opportunities for those traditionally hampered by organizational barriers (Gunn 1995).
- support for individuals through opportunities to enhance cultural awareness, aesthetic appreciation, and the potential to lead meaningful lives (Galbraith and Cohen 1995).
A traditional mentoring model is the apprentice learning from a master. Whilst in the past mentoring focused on career advancement within organizational hierarchies (Haney 1997) a wide range of cognitive, interpersonal, and methdological skills are increasingly required for employment; mentoring is being re-examined as a way of facilitating the development of these skills.
Mentorship and Change
The is increasing awareness of the need to preserve institutional memory and to share the information and experience that remain in the company as a form of knowledge development and to foster innovation. Mentors have been seen as representing continuity. It is also interesting to note that in countries with relatively high levels of formal academic education mentoring is seen as a way of passing on and developing practical know-how and wisdom ("craft knowledge") that can be acquired only experientially. Therefore, many organizations are instituting formal mentoring programs as a cost-effective way to upgrade skills, enhance recruitment and retention, and increase job satisfaction (Jossi 1997).
Mentoring and Learning
Mentoring supports much of what is currently known about how individuals learn, including the socially constructed nature of learning and the importance of experiential, situated learning experiences (Kerka 1997). According to constructivist theory, learning is most effective when situated in a context in which new knowledge and skills will be used and individuals construct meaning for themselves but within the context of interaction with others. Experts facilitate learning by modeling problem-solving strategies, guiding learners in approximating the strategies while learners articulate their thought processes. Experts coach learners with appropriate scaffolds or aids, gradually decreasing assistance as learners internalize the process and construct their own knowledge and understanding (Kerka). These processes are reflected in the mentor's roles of guide, adviser, coach, motivator, facilitator, and role model within a contextual setting (Galbraith and Cohen 1995; Haney 1997; Kaye and Jacobson 1996). Functioning as experts, mentors provide authentic, experiential learning opportunities as well as an intense interpersonal relationship through which social learning takes place.
Mentoring and Experiential Learning
Bell (1997) likens the mentor's role in experiential learning to that of birds guiding their young in leaving the nest; they support without rescuing, provide scaffolding (e.g., in a problem situation, asking "What do think you should do next?"), and have the courage to let learners fail. Learning from experience, "mentees speed past learning basic routines and get on to the job...they enjoy a fast linkup between what was learned in the classroom and what is needed in the workplace" (Galbraith and Cohen 1995, p. 60). Exploring how experience is transformed into expertise, Cleminson and Bradford (1996) identify three types of learning: trial and error, "sitting by Nellie" (observing an experienced person), and guided learning. The latter, they suggest, is characteristic of the most effective mentoring. With trust as the foundation of the relationship, mentors give proteges a safe place to try out ideas, skills, and roles with minimal risk (Kaye and Jacobson 1996). Such experiments are more authentic when linked with real-world activities such as temporary work assignments or short-term projects. The knowledge acquired is thus constantly reinterpreted and developed through practice (Cleminson and Bradford 1996).
Mentoring and Relational Learning
Although learning is a matter of individual interpretation of experiences, it takes place within the social context (Kerka 1997). Therefore, the interpersonal relationship of mentor and mentee is recognized as essential (Galbraith and Cohen 1995). "The idea of learning as a transaction--an interactive and evolving process between mentors and their adult learners--is considered a fundamental component of the adult mentoring relationship" (ibid., p. 17). Mentoring provides two primary functions: career/instrumental and psychosocial. The instrumental function is the external value of the relationship; mentees benefit from their mentor's knowledge, contacts, support, and guidance. The psychosocial function is the internal value of the ongoing interpersonal dialogue, collaborative critical thinking, planning, reflection, and feedback (Galbraith and Cohen 1995).
The psychosocial function of mentoring is a form of relational learning, the value of which is increasingly being recognized in a less hierarchical, team environment. Women especially have been found to favor relational learning. For the executive women in Bierema's (1996) study, "relationships informed them about their company's culture and helped them process both cognitive and experiential learning experiences" (p. 157). Mentoring is a personalized and systematic way to be socialized into an organization's culture; such cultural competence is important in both work and academic settings.
If developing learning organizations in a learning society is a desirable social goal, mentoring can perform an important function in helping people develop their highest potential. If "everyone is capable of being a teacher (mentor) and a learner (mentee)" (ibid., p. 92), Kerka concludes that individuals should strive to develop their capacity to learn from and support the learning of others.
