Using multimedia software

12-July-2006

comments (1) forum (1) email this
Multimedia software is easy enough to use. What is problematic is the workflow. The workflow is designed for specialists - not for teachers or educationalists.

Multimedia software is not particularly difficult to use. It is quite rewarding in that there is an air of mystique - you really know how to mix sound or to edit video. In truth it is no harder than using Microsoft word (although perhaps that is not a recommendation).

What is difficult is the workflow. even using Apple software (designed with a services layer for interoperability between different applications) workflows are clunky, each project seems to be different and require advance thought with alternative ways of doing things. the result if that even simple projects become extremely time consuming.

Why is this? Large file sizes don't help. Sharing files can be difficult - they often will not fit on a memory stick. More than that no one seems to have thought out what the software might be used for in the real work. Instead it is designed to a technical specification - for ideal type uses by specialists - not by educationalists, teachers or researchers as one part of a busy workload.

Technorati Tags: ,


Graham Attwell; 12-July-2006 13:51:38; forum (1) help

1 Replies (comments)

Use the quick-comment form below to add your own comment, or go to the forum interface for this weblog entry for more complete options for replying, editing, etc
Click the title of a reply to open it as a discussion thread (to reply, edit, etc) -

1 Multimedia Software

An interesting observation...

I'll presume that you're including "e-learning software" in the category of multimedia?

Your observation is sound, but what's the solution? I suppose I've accepted as a given that authoring software is challenging to use and that the richness of features stems from the requirements of e-learning. Tools like "Authorware" I found difficult to fathom, while others out there seem to have the curriculum designer in mind.

How do we get some kind of reusability and minimized work effort included in our tools?

Mark Sheppard, 17-July-2006 00:55:33 forum / discussion

Comments please

If you are already registered here, please click the "Login" button to send your username/password with the comment. Click the "Anonymous/Join" button to leave a comment without logging in.

Please tell us who you are

E-Mail Address (Required)
We need a valid email address in order for you to post a comment. You will recieve an email containing a special validation link. The comment will not be published until validated
Name
Please leave your name
Join the site (optional)
If you would like to join the site while posting this comment, then choose a username.
Usernames must contain no spaces or special characters.
Title
Lead-in
Body Text ( HTML tags are allowed )
Validation
Please enter the text from the image above
Preview your comment

Linking and trackbacks

When linking to this weblog entry, please use the 'permalink', which is http://www.knownet.com/writing/weblogs/Graham_Attwell/entries/2941332056

Some weblog systems will ask you for a "trackback link" (most systems will find this special 'hook' automatically, in the code for this page).

The trackback link for this entry is http://www.knownet.com/writing/weblogs/Graham_Attwell/entries/2941332056/tb