Does e-learning lead to social isolation?

14-August-2006

comments (2)

Last week I wrote about workers being unwilling to participate in e-learning because of the perception that computer based learning is socially isolating.

I had a very interesting reply from Thomas Ryberg which warrants further thought.

Thomas says: first of all I think it is important to mention that the term e-learning is a bit too generic for such a conclusion to be made (which you also seem to be aware of :-). My position would be that it is not the e- as such that creates social isolation, but rather the pedagogical approach of the e-learning course. Do you have any data that can shed light on such relations, because that would be interesting? A Danish survey of SME learning concluded that most of the courses were very individually oriented - download material, answer a quiz. If that is the pedagogy of most of the courses, then certainly I think the feeling of social isolation would appear. But I guess the same goes for f2f learning. Many students at Danish Universities report that they feel socially isolated and it is a reason for quite a few to abandon their studies. This is, I guess, due to the pedagogical approach - come to a lecture with 100 strangers and then go do your reports alone. A second thing is that a discourse on 'internet as socially isolating' is strong among parents and the 40+ plus generation. They are in general afraid that their kids will become socially isolated (which is because they often don't know much about what their kids do - basically they use their computers to communicate with all of their friends :-). But I guess the discourse on computers, internet and social isolation goes back a while...what I was not quite sure about in your post was actually whether people reported actually being socially isolated after having participated in an actual course; or whether it was sort of something holding people back from joining a course - due to fear of becoming socially isolated?"

Well, lets clear up the last point first. It was a perception, rather than an experienced reality, that e-learning would be socially isolating. But in reality I think they are probably right. Learning is a social activity. basically, mots e-learing has replicated the cognitive processes of the classroom, whilst paying little or no attention to the social processes. What is interesting from our research is we found many workers using ICT for informal learning - using web sites, forums, chat functions etc. No-one complained that this was socially isolating. But of source they did not, themselves, perceive this as learning. Neither did their managers.

So it is partly to do with the perceptions of e-learning and partly to do with the pedagogy. The use of social software and the promotion of informal e-learning can overcome both perceptions and the reality of isolation.

Has anyone else a view on this?

Technorati Tags: ,


Graham Attwell; 14-August-2006 14:22:26;

2 Replies (comments)

-

1 Sometimes...

Hi Graham,

If you're talking about personally-driven elearning, such as what I'm doing here: reading blogs & responding - then that can be highly social.

If you're talking about more formal learning experiences , such as via a university, then the picture can be very mixed.... I'm doing a totally online Masters degree (in elearning) and at times it is incredibly isolating. If the tutors set individual assignments with no real need for discussion then it's really just between you and the tutor (if you're lucky!). If the tutor sets group assignments (thus forcing interaction) then it can be very social - but the disadvantage here is that these groups can also be extremely artificial - with the assignments not bearing much relevance to our individual professional lives. So there's an interesting design conundrum here...

Mark

Mark Berthelemy, 22-August-2006 15:49:38
Latest reply: Social networks; 30-August-2006 18:35:14 by Graham Attwell

2 Thanks for clearing up :)

Thanks for clearing up the issue about perceived vs. actual experiences and very interesting to hear about what the workers and managers think of as 'learning' - I guess we still have a long way to go in opening up the meanings of what it is to learn. I very much agree that the social processes are often neglected in online courses, or alternatively are just expected to emerge without any conscious effort the planning or design of the course. This is not to say that sociabilty in learning as such can be instrumentally designed, but I believe it can be 'afforded' both through making available different tools and through e.g. consciously designing tasks that potentially can foster some social relations (in an online course I co-designed, the first week was sort of reserved for getting to know each other and all through the course there was a focus on the social elements). In relation to the conundrom mentioned above, I think there is a very good point. In an online master course (Master in ICT and learning) I know of, this is addressed through Problem Oriented Project Pedagogy (POPP), which means that students work with a shared project over 4 months - this project must take outset in a real problem experienced by the members of the group (they're professionals) - so they have to negotiate a mutually experienced problem, which they work intensively with for quite some time. In this sense they 'own' their problem (it is not given by the teacher) and must identify the theories and methods, which can help them to 'solve' the problem. This sort of 'solves' the problem of 'artificiality' but is of course a very time and resource consuming pedagogy. Finally, I very much agree that bringing social software and informal learning together would be a major step forward. Often courses become very self-contained entities, which are not very open to explore the multiple relations and resources both students and teachers could bring into a course through their different formal/informal networks e.g. through blog-reading, affinity groups etc. But thanks for clearing up the issue - when will the book be out?
Thomas Ryberg, 23-August-2006 08:48:40
Latest reply: Thanks for your comments; 30-August-2006 19:51:20 by Graham Attwell