Developing an Open Participatory Learning Infrastructure
26-March-2007
permalinkA new report for the Hewlett Foundation talks of creating an Open Participatory Learning Infrastructure as "a dream space for participatory learning that enables students anywhere to engage in experimenting, exploring, building, tinkering and reflecting in a way that makes learning by doing and productive inquiry a seamless process".
I am in Houston, Texas for the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation 2007 Open Educational resources Grantees meeting.
Central to the event is a presentation by Daniel Atkins, John Seely Brown, and Allen Hammond, of their
It is a substantial report with many interesting asides and well worth a read.
They identify the following 'key enablers' as driving the OER movement:
They go on to say that "the proposed OPLI seeks to enable a decentralized learning environment that: (1) permits distributed participatory learning; (2) provides incentives for participation (provisioning of open resources, creating specific learning environments, evaluation) at all levels; and (3) encourages cross-boundary and cross cultural learning." The OPLI can be envisaged as "a dream space for participatory learning that enables students anywhere to engage in experimenting, exploring, building, tinkering and reflecting in a way that makes learning by doing and productive inquiry a seamless process."
This is good stuff indeed - visionary but not beyond the realms of what can be achieved. Particularly welcome is the weving together of technical and social objectives. My only reservation is the continued stress on the role of higher education institutions - but maybe this is a reflection of the objectives of the Hewlett Foundation.
More tomorrow - I'll try and post a couple of live blogs from the conference. In the meantime I'm off to the Longneck Reception and the Good Company Barbecue Dinner.
Central to the event is a presentation by Daniel Atkins, John Seely Brown, and Allen Hammond, of their
It is a substantial report with many interesting asides and well worth a read.
They identify the following 'key enablers' as driving the OER movement:
- "open source code, open multimedia content and the community or institutional structures that produce or enable them;
- the growth of what we are calling participatory systems architecture; Our notion of architecture includes both technical and social dimensions.
- the continuing improvement in performance and access to the underlying information and communication technology (ICT);
- increasing availability and use of rich media, virtual environments, and gaming; and
- the emerging deeper basic insights into human learning (both individual and community) that can informed and validated by pilot projects and action-based research."
They go on to say that "the proposed OPLI seeks to enable a decentralized learning environment that: (1) permits distributed participatory learning; (2) provides incentives for participation (provisioning of open resources, creating specific learning environments, evaluation) at all levels; and (3) encourages cross-boundary and cross cultural learning." The OPLI can be envisaged as "a dream space for participatory learning that enables students anywhere to engage in experimenting, exploring, building, tinkering and reflecting in a way that makes learning by doing and productive inquiry a seamless process."
This is good stuff indeed - visionary but not beyond the realms of what can be achieved. Particularly welcome is the weving together of technical and social objectives. My only reservation is the continued stress on the role of higher education institutions - but maybe this is a reflection of the objectives of the Hewlett Foundation.
More tomorrow - I'll try and post a couple of live blogs from the conference. In the meantime I'm off to the Longneck Reception and the Good Company Barbecue Dinner.
Graham Attwell; 26-March-2007 21:20:48;
permalink
